153 vs 155 - will I really notice the difference- |
|
| Author | |
andy_d
Lift Op.
Joined: Dec/04/2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 24 |
Quote Reply
Topic: 153 vs 155 - will I really notice the difference-Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 9:09am |
|
So I'm planning on buying a Never Summer SL. I'm torn on the size though
I'm 5'8 157 lbs - still losing weight though as I'm training with someone. Chances are I will weigh around 150 by the end of it If I go by the guide on here, it looks like I should go with 155 but add more if I want more of a freeride board. I want an all mountain board with no intentions of going into the park. Maybe hit some kickers and some buttering but priority is more getting into trees and riding back country. And groomers when not in the others. I'm currently on a 152 Burton Process VRocker which I never liked. Hoping to get more out of the SL Would 155 be the better option? It's been suggested to me that I should go with 153 as it'll be a little more fun and that it would be easier to maneuver in say trees |
|
![]() |
|
Witty1
Ski Bum
Joined: Nov/22/2011 Location: 19 Online Status: Offline Posts: 491 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 9:29am |
|
in my opinion...
If you wont hit the park... go with the 155, it'll allow you more float and stability. for those pow runs and high speed groomers. If you are looking for a backcountry board... May I assume a pow board? You might want something with even more float & charge-ability (made that word up). But that board would be pretty much pow specific and you would have a harder time in the trees... |
|
![]() |
|
Oinker
Instructor
Joined: Oct/22/2009 Location: 9 Online Status: Online Posts: 481 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 9:36am |
|
once you pull the trigger on which size NEVER SUMMER SL you decide to go with & you get that baby on the snow you are going to love it. It Will Become Your New Favorite Snowboard... Ever!!!! I ride a 158 SL i'm 5'10 & weigh between 175 & 180... Depending on how many beers i've had that week. LOL!!! My riding style sounds very similar to how you plan on riding your board so i would say go with the 155. Granted you may lose a bit of quick maneuverability in the trees but will gain more stability on bigger runs & on bombers. Also that little extra float on pow days! The NEVER SUMMER decks are absolutely amazing!!!! Unreal response & control in almost any condition & at any speed. i have a total of 6 different snowboards and find it difficult to ride anything other than my NEVER SUMMER SL because it shreds in all conditions. Again, in my opinion based on how you plan to use the board, i would go with the 155. ...you are going to fall in love with that deck a few turns into your very first run!!!! |
|
![]() |
|
nuttynutz
Local
Joined: Apr/16/2008 Location: 4 Online Status: Offline Posts: 123 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 9:40am |
|
sounds like you should get the 155.
Like witty said, if you're not hitting the park, go for the 155, and if you do hit the park to go on kickers, the bigger board has slightly better stability when landing anyway. Buttering probably helps with a smaller board but that doesn't appear to be your main reason to get a 153 What didn't you like about the burton process vrocker? felt unstable? then as above get the 155. Will you notice the difference between 153 and 155? every so slightly, if you're a beginner then prob not at all. I weigh 145lbs ish and ride a 154 for my all mountain board (70%mountain 30% park) |
|
![]() |
|
steezemisterr
Ski Bum
Joined: May/25/2012 Location: 23 Online Status: Offline Posts: 584 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 11:39am |
|
I'm the same height as you and I used to ride a 155. I rode a lot of park and it worked fine for me just in case you ever plan on hitting the park, although it sounds like you have no intention. But all around on the mountain it is a great size for people our height because it feels stable and I always felt in control. Definitely go with the 155.
|
|
![]() |
|
snowboardinrox357
Local
Joined: Jan/01/2012 Location: 18 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1135 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 2:31pm |
|
I think you should get a 155 board. It will provide better stability so you can maneuver around the trees easilier.
|
|
![]() |
|
snowj720
Instructor
Wish it was cold in my backyard all year long..... Joined: Jan/28/2009 Location: 36 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2082 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 5:52pm |
|
^ I always figure the opposite- the shorter the board the easier to manuver around trees. While I like the float I get from my pow board back in the freshies of the trees, I do like my park board for quick turns and less to clip on the close calls
|
|
![]() |
|
RastaRider
Instructor
Joined: Aug/09/2008 Location: 9 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1263 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 6:04pm |
That is true, smaller boards typically mean easier to maneuver, longer boards are typically more stable(though of course there is more to it than just the length, but generally speaking thats the case). Stability =/= maneuverability, but I wouldn't expect that useless spammer to know that. You should know by now to not take anything snowboardinrox says seriously, he's shown his ignorance and overall worthlessness time and time again. As for the OP, I agree with everyone above, 155 would be ideal for you.
|
|
![]() |
|
spenser
Instructor
Joined: Jul/24/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 14295 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Aug/31/2012 at 7:01pm |
|
55. still not a big board at all. better for your weight and the things you want to do with it. i'm 145lb and prefer 158-160 normally and still don't find it very large. 55 for sure between the two. the 53 will give you no benefits over the 55.
|
|
![]() |
|
andy_d
Lift Op.
Joined: Dec/04/2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 24 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Sep/30/2012 at 5:31am |
|
Guys I apologize for not responding sooner with all the advice given. I did want to say that I did follow and I have my 155 SL sitting in my living room. I can't wait to ride it this season!!
|
|
![]() |
|
julius77
Instructor
Joined: Mar/16/2008 Location: 18 Online Status: Online Posts: 2170 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Sep/30/2012 at 10:06pm |
|
Sweet- Throw up a pic when you get a sec!
|
|
|
Shop smart... Shop S-Mart.
|
|
![]() |
|
andrethegiant
Instructor
Joined: Mar/08/2010 Location: 20 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1610 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Oct/01/2012 at 6:27am |
|
I'm your same weight, and was in the same dilema. I'm 6'0 160ish and the ultrafear at my shop was only left in a 151, i'd been a 55 burton love, but made the switch. Now i rode mainly park on the 51, but i'd do anything to have kept my hero for days I just felt like riding, a 55 is much better than a 52-53 for our size. and it's still more than capable in the park. Best of luck!
|
|
![]() |
|
scuddera
Instructor
hitting my first 5 Joined: Dec/03/2010 Location: 37 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1134 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Oct/01/2012 at 7:40am |
|
One would think 2cm would really not really notice a difference but I ride a 156cm and rode my buddies 155 and it felt great but definitely seemed small. I have also rode a 153 and it felt like I was on a smalls board. Up to you I guess but I can see a diffeence
|
|
![]() |
|
nitro909
Ski Bum
Joined: Nov/06/2010 Location: 19 Online Status: Offline Posts: 59 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Oct/01/2012 at 8:34am |
I highly doubt you noticed the size diff. I'm sure what you noticed was the diff in characteristics between the three boards. Likewise, you can have 3 diff boards all in the same size, and get 3 totally diff 'feelings' from them. When people say they prefer/like a specific size of boards, I've come to realize they're full of shit and have no idea what they are talking about. |
|
![]() |
|
jhoang6
Instructor
Mt. Seymour Joined: Dec/06/2010 Location: 51 Online Status: Online Posts: 1560 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Oct/01/2012 at 9:22am |
I would have to agree with the smaller the board generally more control in terms of manuverability. and long the more stable. Congrats on getting your 55
|
|
![]() |
|
Lux
Local
Two-handed tail block Joined: Mar/08/2011 Location: 51 Online Status: Offline Posts: 889 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Oct/01/2012 at 4:30pm |
|
Just an FYI, but usually these small increments in snowboard size are not focused solely on its length and effective edge... These small 2 cm increments are to address changes in board widths and sidecut. Have a look at the specs between 153 and 155 models; I can almost guarantee the primary change is on the widths and sidecut.
|
|
![]() |
|
andy_d
Lift Op.
Joined: Dec/04/2011 Online Status: Offline Posts: 24 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Oct/06/2012 at 3:39pm |
![]() |
|
Duneluder
Local
Joined: Oct/02/2008 Location: 15 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2391 |
Quote Reply
Posted: Oct/18/2012 at 3:02pm |
Wow Spenser, a 158-160 seems big for someone your size. Is it mostly because you're riding that famed AK pow? (you bastard) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
Daily GiveawayRecent Winners
|
|
| Up to 40% Off |